Question:
I dont believe in Global Warming?
anonymous
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
I dont believe in Global Warming?
Seventeen answers:
sbbrad99
2008-01-04 07:30:39 UTC
I don't personally believe in this Global Warming but.... but ...

I believe there are some people who are making this out to be a little too much for a bad thing for it to be a believable thing. So much information on the negative side of this tpic and you get some fanatics who can not answer straight questions. Of course the world is changing. But we have to remember that the air is much cleaner now than it was 100 or 150 years ago due to the advancements in technology. So if you are going to worry about this thing, that is your perogative but I am just going to live happily ever after not worrying about the inevitable.
Half-pint
2008-01-04 11:55:32 UTC
well let me thank you for being and individual first and thinking for yourself most people just like to join in on things. Well the earth is getting warmer but it was getting colder between 1945 and the mid 1970's. Go back a little more than 1 thousand years and it was much warmer than today. The biggest emitter of C02 is the ocean even volcanoes and living things give off more C02 than us. C02 levels rise after temperature levels rise due to the ocean being able to absorb more C02 when it is cold and release more when it is warm. These are all arguments against man made global warming.



i don't belive in MAN MADE global warming.
★☆Janessa★☆
2008-01-04 01:01:43 UTC
Global warming is real and it is a fact....



global warming is caused by greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane(a kind of gas when the rubbish rottens and the gas also come from cow faeces)



Global warming cause the sea level to rise and the ice in artic to melt and break into smaller pieces.hence,it will be harder for polar bears,penguins and seals to find food and move about.



It is a fact,not a myth or legend :)
ucg_jhimples03
2008-01-04 06:35:27 UTC
You are absolutely wrong...

Don't get me wrong but there are scientific reasoning that there is an abnormal change with the climate all around the world... It is a serious problem and even the most powerful countries are very afraid of what will likely to happen in the near future... The glaciers will melt away and the islands and islets will sink in water and it will take a very long years to form the glaciers and it will consider as the new beginning of the evolution of life... That is why we have to be very responsible in taking care of the planet Earth...
anonymous
2008-01-03 17:46:19 UTC
Global warming is fact. The only unanswered questions are to whether mankind is causing/accelerating it. There is no 100% conclusive proof (yet) that we are to blame but there are piles of evidence that suggest that it is indeed the case.



Ranger - A study of climate over a mere 10 yrs means absolutely nothing...
dekakashi
2008-01-03 18:19:25 UTC
I agree with some people that mentioned that global warming is a fact and the question is what caused it. Some said it's us the humans, and some said it's natural.



I suggest you to watch "The Inconvenient Truth" by Algore

You don't have to like him to watch this movie, i watched it because the statistics are real.
lynus
2008-01-03 18:23:14 UTC
I don't think anyone can convince you, in fact it seems that you are dead set on this topic. Your cocky attitude won't allow you to see the truth of the facts. So go jump in you v10 F-350, slam a save our troops sticker on the bumper and deny the facts. That's what all the other close-minded selfish people are doing. So ignore the problem, your kids will thank you for it later.
lizzie
2008-01-04 01:04:24 UTC
you may want to read this short article:



"Is Global Warming Real?"



Visit this site

http://allathazel.blogspot.com/2008/01/is-global-warming-real.html
Ranger473
2008-01-03 17:50:28 UTC
Hard to do when your right. Today the latest global temperatures were just released and it was found that since 1998 the earth's temperature has been stable and in fact may have even decreased a bit.
Bob
2008-01-03 18:10:14 UTC
Can't do it in a Yahoo answer. You'll actually have to do some work, and read the overwhelming scientific proof in the links.



This is science and what counts is the data.



"I wasn’t convinced by a person or any interest group—it was the data that got me. I was utterly convinced of this connection between the burning of fossil fuels and climate change. And I was convinced that if we didn’t do something about this, we would be in deep trouble.”



Vice Admiral Richard H. Truly, USN (Ret.)

Former NASA Administrator, Shuttle Astronaut and the first Commander of the Naval Space Command



Here are two summaries of the mountain of peer reviewed data that convinced Admiral Truly and the vast majority of the scientific community, short and long.



http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/Image:Climate_Change_Attribution.png

http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/wg1-report.html

summarized at:

http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-spm.pdf



It's (mostly) not the sun:



http://solar-center.stanford.edu/sun-on-earth/FAQ2.html



And the first graph above shows that the sun is responsible for about 10% of it. When someone says it's the sun they're saying that thousands of climatologists are stupid and don't look at the solar data. That's ridiculous.



Science is quite good about exposing bad science or hoaxes:



http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/ATG/polywater.html



There's a large number of people who agree that it is real and mostly caused by us, who are not liberals, environmentalists, stupid, or conceivably part of a "conspiracy". Just three examples of many:



"Former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich challenged fellow conservatives to stop resisting scientific evidence of global warming"



"Our nation has both an obligation and self-interest in facing head-on the serious environmental, economic and national security threat posed by global warming."



Senator John McCain, Republican, Arizona



“DuPont believes that action is warranted, not further debate."



Charles O. Holliday, Jr., CEO, DuPont



There's a lot less controversy about this is the real world than there is on Yahoo answers:



http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articles/home_page/412.php?lb=hmpg1&pnt=412&nid=&id=



And vastly less controversy in the scientific community than you might guess from the few skeptics talked about here:



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686



"There's a better scientific consensus on this [climate change] than on any issue I know... Global warming is almost a no-brainer at this point. You really can't find intelligent, quantitative arguments to make it go away."



Dr. Jerry Mahlman, NOAA



Good websites for more info:



http://profend.com/global-warming/

http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/dn11462

http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science/

http://www.realclimate.org

"climate science from climate scientists"
Richard the Physicist
2008-01-04 07:34:43 UTC
You made a statement, you didn't ask a question. From the way you phrased it your mind is already made up. Nothing we can say will change it, and my guess is nothing a scientist could say would change it.
anonymous
2014-06-16 04:56:19 UTC
Go outside. Is it warm? There you go
anonymous
2008-01-03 18:33:13 UTC
You're not wrong. Tonight on the news this guy said, and i quote " Global warming may br the reason for this sudden decrease in temperature." WTF???
anonymous
2008-01-03 18:02:31 UTC
so what theory do you think better explains the resent increases in temperature? most of the are rebutted here http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/dn11462
Amy Z
2008-01-03 18:12:31 UTC
I can't convince you, but perhaps this video will?



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oi8651Acu4
mamaraz
2008-01-03 18:48:17 UTC
If You are American, I'll convince You with this US Statement's position below:



Statement on International Climate Change Negotiations: Restoring U.S. Leadership

Paula J. Dobriansky, Under Secretary for Democracy and Global Affairs

Statement before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee

Washington, DC November 13, 2007



Mr. Chairman, thank you. I am submitting a longer testimony for the record. Climate change is a serious problem, and humans are contributing to it. We are at a critical moment. Addressing this global challenge requires substantial global reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. And we are committed to doing our part.



Bali Roadmap

At this December's climate conference in Bali, we will work with our partners to launch a new phase in climate diplomacy. We seek a "Bali Roadmap" that will advance negotiations under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and develop a post-2012 framework that effectively addresses climate change and strengthens our energy security. The United States is committed to concluding this effort by 2009.



I recently attended a meeting of key heads of delegation in Bogor, Indonesia to prepare the way for a successful meeting in Bali. I was encouraged to hear broad support for a Bali Roadmap and for a 2009 end date. At the Bogor meeting, ministers identified four key elements that a Bali Roadmap will need to address: mitigation, adaptation to the impacts of climate change, finance, and technology.



Key Considerations in Developing a Post-2012 Framework, We enter the Bali meeting with an open mind, prepared to consider ideas proposed by our negotiating partners, in pursuit of a post-2012 framework that successfully rises to the scale and scope of this challenge. Our deliberations will be guided by two considerations: a post-2012 framework must be environmentally effective and economically sustainable.



Emissions are global and the solution, to be effective, will need to be global. We want the world's largest emitters, including the United States, to be part of a global agreement. An approach in which only some are acting is not environmentally effective.



A future framework must be flexible and accommodate a diverse range of national circumstances. A future framework must also be cost effective and economically sustainable. We must develop and bring to market clean energy technologies at a cost that countries can justify to their citizens.



Major Economies Process

The Major Economies process launched by President Bush in May 2007 is intended to contribute to progress toward a global agreement under the UNFCCC. Our aim is to find a formula that can work for all major economies and achieve consensus next year on key elements for a post-2012 framework.



The September 27-28 Major Economies Meeting here in Washington marked an excellent start. We brought together 17 economies, representing some 80% of the world's economy, energy use, and greenhouse gas emissions. UN representatives were also at the table with us. The Major Economies agreed that we would convene again in the new year, informed by our deliberations in Bali.



We believe the Major Economies process will make a positive contribution to efforts under the UNFCCC by focusing on certain key elements of a future global framework.



We can work together to develop a long-term global goal for emissions reductions. We can identify national plans that will put us on the path toward this global goal, with each country designing its own mix of binding, market-based, and voluntary measures.



We can identify technology development and deployment strategies for key sectors - such as advanced coal technologies and second-generation biofuels - working with the private sector, civil society, and international partners. We can explore ways to improve our measurement and accounting systems. We can discuss options for financing and eliminating barriers to trade in clean energy goods and services. And we can address forestry, adaptation, and technology access.



Forests, Adaptation, and Technology Let me highlight these last three issues -- forestry, adaptation, and technology access -- because they will be critical to our discussions in the UNFCCC and the Major Economies .



Avoided deforestation is a priority for Indonesia and many other developing countries, and it will be a focus of discussions in Bali.



The United States is an international leader in promoting forest conservation. For example: Under the Tropical Forest Conservation Act, we have concluded with 12 countries debt-for-nature agreements that are generating $163 million to help conserve up to 20 million hectares of important tropical forests around the world.



We are combating illegal logging and the export of illegally harvested forest products in Africa, Asia, and Latin America through the President's Initiative Against Illegal Logging.



Through the Congo Basin Forest Partnership, we have contributed $68 million to better manage 80 million hectares - an area the size of Texas - in the world's second largest tropical forest.



Adaptation is an increasing priority both at home and internationally, and we are promoting effective planning as part of broader development strategies. The United States is leading efforts such as the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS), which gives communities early warning of natural disasters, and improves decision-making for agriculture, coastal development and other economic sectors that are affected by climate variability and change .



And, to accelerate the uptake of clean energy technologies around the world, President Bush has proposed a new international clean technology fund. Secretary Paulson is working with international partners in developing a new approach for spurring investments in the global energy infrastructure that reduce greenhouse gas emissions.



APP

Another Administration initiative that is engaging key economies in dealing with climate change is the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate (APP), a public private partnership to promote economic growth, enhance energy security, and mitigate greenhouse gas missions.



Under this partnership, countries that account for some 50% of the global economy, emissions, and energy use are putting clean technologies into widespread use. Canada just joined China, India, South Korea, Japan, Australia, and the United States in this partnership.



Through the APP, American Electric Power, the Southern Company and other leading U.S. firms have been working with Chinese electricity producers to move them toward U.S. levels of efficiency, which reduces emissions and toxic air pollution - and fosters new trade relationships.



The APP has brought to India state-of-the-art U.S. technologies for mining and preparing coal in ways that reduce sulfur dioxide emissions, cut greenhouse gas emissions and increase mine safety.



And throughout APP countries, we are fostering best practices in the cement, aluminum, and steel sectors that save money, reduce emissions, and increase international investment.



Advanced coal technologies are a particular focus within and beyond the APP. The United States has invested more than $2.5 billion to research and develop clean coal since 2001.



In conclusion, the scale of the climate challenge calls for comprehensive, international action for generations to come. We are engaged, serious, pragmatic, and committed to continued leadership internationally.



Finally, I'd like to introduce Dan Reifsnyder, Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of Oceans, Environment and Science at the State Department, who was Deputy Negotiator of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change in 1989, and has participated in almost every Conference of the Parties. He will be with us in Bali. Thank you Mr. Chairman.



Released on November 13, 2007
Ronda B
2008-01-03 17:46:31 UTC
Don't be a nitwit....google it.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...