Flossie,
To answer your question it needs to be framed within a timescale. If we look at a short time-scale, one of a matter of months, then sea-levels are falling; but if we extend that to a period of years then sea-levels are rising.
I suspect that gist of your question relates to the drop in sea-levels that have been observed in the last few months, that being the case then it is true that sea-levels are falling.
Knowing that sea-levels are rising or falling is meaningless unless we know why. And in the case of the recent drop, we do know why, it’s been caused by oscillations in the Southern Pacific.
These oscillations, collectively known as ENSO (El Nino Southern Oscillation) have three phases – positive, neutral and negative. The positive phase is associated with El Nino conditions whilst the negative phase corresponds to the La Nina conditions.
Look back at the graph you linked to and note where the sharpest rise in sea-levels is. It coincides with the strongest El Nino event ever recorded and the one that led to exceptionally warm global temperatures in 1998. During El Nino episodes the average global temperature goes up and rainfall goes down, the reverse is true during La Nina episodes.
In July 2010 we entered a strong La Nina episode, such an event cools the global climate and leads to increased rainfall. It’s right at this point that the average sea-level begins to fall. Partly because the cooling climate slows the rate of thermal expansion of the seas and oceans but much more significantly, because immense amounts of water are transferred from the oceans to the land.
Think back to summer of last year, right at the point when sea-levels began falling we have the devastating floods in Asia, so widespread were these floods that there’s still 20 million people who are homeless as a result of them.
These floods weren’t alone. In the last 12 to 18 months there has been a record number of flood events all around the world. I think it’s true to say that there hasn’t been one day since the summer of 2010 when there haven’t been fatal floods somewhere in the world, and that’s never happened before.
With La Nina dumping significantly more precipitation on land there is a corresponding fall in global sea-levels. In time of course, this water makes it’s way back into the seas and oceans, but this is a slow process and one which is compensated for by an accelerated hydrological cycle.
Look again at your graph and notice how the fall in sea-levels has levelled off in the last few months, this corresponds with the ending of the recent La Nina episode and a return to neutral ENSO conditions. In fact, if you were to plot the strength of ENSO against the change in sea levels you’d see a strong correlation between the two (should you wish to do so then download the Oceanic Nino Index data together with the data from the page you linked to).
The question now is what’s going to happen in the next few months. ENSO never remains in the neutral phase for long and it’s not unusual, having exited one La Nina episode, to dip back into another. Should that happen then it’s possible there will be a further slight drop in sea-levels. On the other hand, if we enter an El Nino phase, then we’ll see a very rapid rise in sea levels – the 5mm drop in the last year or so will quickly be compensated for and the next 12 months of the graph will look similar to the rise seen in 1997.
So, if in the next year or so we see a rapid rise in sea-levels (more than 6.4mm) and anyone claims this is caused by global warming, you can tell them that the majority of the rise (more than 3.2mm of it) is caused due to a slow down of the hydrological cycle and percolation of water through the ground returning to the seas caused by a switching from La Nina to El Nino conditions.
A shorter answer would have been to say that sea-levels are falling now but it’s a predictable temporary thing.