climate change for science assignment?

Question

were looking at how human activites are causing climate change
were looking at a graph that shows armospeheric concentrations and anthropogenic emissions
the task is what pattern in the evidence?
does the gas stay in the universe of does it spread away?? < MAIN QUESTION
how reliable is the evidence?
URGENT

Answer 1

I can use charts that prove that fire hydrants cause rape.



More fire hydrants in an area, the more rapes. No fire hydrants, no rape.



See the pattern in the evidence?



It's even more reliable than the evidence that anthropogenic emissions cause climate change.

Answer 2

a million. community climate commerce is purely what it says - substitute of community climate. this isn't about one risky iciness or a warm summer season, it will be a metamorphosis to wide-spread climate kinds over the lengthy run (i.E. a lengthy time period or more desirable) 2. There are really a variety of of factors. Shake, Rattle and Roll are variations in our orbit about the picture voltaic and alignment to the daylight impact community climate and relate to ice a lengthy time period. airborne dirt and mud in the ecosystem led to by technique of volcanic workout, aeroplanes and quite huge meterorites hitting the earth impact the elements. differences of distinct atmospheric gases comparable to CO2, methane, CFC's and so on modify climate. adjustments in albedo (the reflectivity of the earth's floor) have an result on community climate, for representation might want to you damage an excellent portion of rain wooded area, the land turns into more desirable refelctive to the rays of the picture voltaic, or overgrazing in semi barren region parts is analogous. 3. a lot i do no longer understand. i'd want to comprehend all of it besides the undeniable fact that no human being would ever be able to take up that a lot suggestion. i'd opt for to have the ability to quote and reference from most of the standard medical papers to wrestle those who study some allegation in a newspaper and make a call the entire idea is incorrect, or those who say pondering this iciness replaced into once chilly in a unmarried small portion of the sector, there is not any longer any warming globally. 4. As above, those with a small quantity of income latch onto one piece of information contained in the media and picture it disproves a lengthy time period of diagnosis. In any large type of people there'll always be a minimum of one who's a chancer or nook-cutter - it would not recommend that any of the others are, and if one mistake is made it would not recommend that each and every little thing else on the placement of the placement is a %. Of lies or authorities conspiracy. that's a pity those minor hiccups get highlighted contained in the media and some adult men and females undertake it because the entire photo even as that's a specific insignificant element. 5. certain, very a lot and were for over 20 years. What I discovered contained in the Eighties is starting to ensue now.

Answer 3

I'll take a shot at the reliability of the evidence by pointing to what I beleive is the primary driver for climate shifts on this plant an dthe solar system in toto.



The Sun. Solar output is NOT constant as the IPCC models assume. There is a great deal more to solar energy than just measuring solar irradience as supporters of the IPCC seem to suggest. Some of the differences are solar wind and the varying intensity therof. Sunspots or lack thereof. examples, sunspot radiat a significantly higher percantatge ot Infra-red radiation over other wavelengths. The wavelengths radiated by sunspots are more redily converted to ehat when absobed by solid materials...



Below are some links show the correlation between solar activity and climatic shifts on planet earth.



2. Weather trend data linked to solar activity. This article references IPCC as well.



http://www.321gold.com/editorials/hoye/hoye040909.pdf



3. This link goes to a number of technical documents data etc detailing the correlation and likely causation between solar activity and the earths climate patterns.



http://www.isthereglobalcooling.com/



4. This report was presented at the International Conference on Climate Change. It is a detailed look at the solar cycle, its correlation to global climate patterns and predicts fairly dramatic cooling over the next decade.



http://www.warwickhughes.com/agri/Solar_Arch_NY_Mar2_08.pdf



5. This link is from some researchers at the University of Wisconsin who have made the first mathematical model that can predict with reasonable accuracy, climate trends. Based on their model, they show that Climate change is almost entirely natural. If you read the article you might get as I did, the impression that the scientists were surprised to learn that man has so little effect.



http://www.wisn.com/print/18935841/detail.html



8. Web site describing satellite data for looking at weather trends on the earth



http://science.nasa.gov/newhome/headlines/essd06oct97_1.htm



10. Article linking solar activity and earth’s climate. Article provides this link with a new computer model, but NASA still says greenhouse gases still supersede. Although another NASA article point out that the sun has been the most active in 1,000 years or more for the past 50 years…



http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/view.php?old=200112065794



17. CERN CLOUD experiment proving relationship between solar magnetic field strength and cloud cover on earth.



http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/08/24/breaking-news-cern-experiment-confirms-cosmic-rays-influence-climate-change/#more-45793



18. New study showing STRONG negative feedback for Clouds.



http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/09/20/new-peer-reviewed-paper-clouds-have-large-negative-feedback-cooling-effect-on-earths-radiation-budget/#more-47761



19. Variable Solar Dynamo – solar Flux fields are degrading no more sunspots are possible after 2015 if this does not reverse.



http://www.cdejager.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/2010-Variable-solar-dynamo3.pdf





20. Three studies on solar physics – Fading sunspots



http://www.space.com/11960-fading-sunspots-slower-solar-activity-solar-cycle.html





I hope you find this useful

Answer 4

The gas stays in the atmosphere for a few years at least. There are some estimates that it is much longer. It is probably much less than 50 years for the half life of CO2 but some estimates are much higher like a hundred years or more from the IPCC but that is not very credible. The problem is that there is very much more in the ocean and the gas exchanges with the water. It is also part of the carbon cycle and very much of it absorbed by trees growing in the spring. When they decay, the carbon in the life gets converted back. It is very complicated trying to define a half life for something in such a dynamic environment. It depends on variables that aren't well known like the capacity of the ocean and biosphere to absorb extra carbon.

http://www.john-daly.com/carbon.htm



The half life is how long it takes for half of something to be removed. For example, with a half life of 50 years, in 200 years only 1/8 would remain. In 300 years that would be 2 raised to the 6th power or 1/32 of it would remain.



I wouldn't listen to anyone trying to tell you that the CO2 would remain in the atmosphere for thousands of years if we stopped "polluting" today. That statement would be just ignorant propaganda and it is complete nonsense.

Answer 5

You will find some contrary information that is based on science, here: www.junkscience.com



You can also find some good contrary evidence here: www.heritage.org



Good Luck

Answer 6

Atmospheric CO2 does correlate with rising temperatures, and so does the PDO. http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1958/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1958/trend/plot/esrl-co2/scale:0.0087/offset:-2.91/plot/jisao-pdo/from:1958/scale:0.2/mean:24

Going back to 1850, http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut3vgl/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1860/to:1880/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1910/to:1942/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1975/to:1999/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1860/to:1880/trend/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1998/trend/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1910/to:1942/trend/plot/hadcrut3vgl/trend/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1975/to:1998/trend

the correlation continues, but weakens. http://www.biomind.de/nogreenhouse/daten/EE%2018-2_Beck.pdf

Atmospheric CO2 has a residence time of ~7 years http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1957.tb01848.x/abstract

before being absorbed by the ocean or the biosphere.



The correlation between atmospheric CO2 and temperature depends on the data set used. http://www.anenglishmanscastle.com/180_years_accurate_Co2_Chemical_Methods.pdf

Comparing the global ocean surface temperature anomalies to the rate of increase in atmospheric CO2 since 1959 shows a good correlation also. In fact, the rate of rise in atmospheric CO2 correlates much better to temperature of the ocean divided by the current Atmospheric CO2 concentration than it does to the rate of production of CO2 via human activities divided by the current CO2 concentration. This indicates that out gassing of CO2 from the ocean might be more important in explaining the recent increase in atmospheric CO2 than human activities are.



Another correlation is to compare the map of global warming since 1979 http://www.ssmi.com/data/msu/graphics/plots/MSU_AMSU_Channel_TLT_Trend_Map_v03_2.png

with the map of global cooling from 1942 to 1979 (below). Note how the recent warming has been in the same places as the previous cooling, indicating a natural cycle is likely to be the explanation for the recent warming rather than anything new.

Answer 7

Do you think that grass and trees care about who emitted the CO2? Do you care what emitted you O2?



Do you have any idea how the planet breathes? Do you know that the rainforests don't provide us with the oxygen we need to live? Based upon your clueless questions, I assume you don't have a clue.