Simply, weather is not climate.
Climate is long term weather trends (as in, decades).
Additionally, your last two links are dead. So your claims are currently baseless.
PS: A local minimum in the solar cycle along with a strong La Nina effect have an excellent masking effect on the true extent of warming. Of course, that's why experts' graphs typically have multi-year averages constructed instead of relying on single points of data. (And it's from these graphs that they overwhelming agree that there is warming going on and humans are contributing to it -- see sources.)
Edit: @Ottawa Mike: Temperatures are determined by multiple trends (increasing greenhouse effect, cyclical solar cycles, cyclical La Nina/El Nino trends, etc). Just like sound waves, their combination can either be constructive or destructive. When the two cycles sync up, they are constructive and can provide an exceptionally hot or cold year, relative to what the greenhouse gases would dictate the temperature to be.
For example purposes, we can model this simply with an equation like
y = x + 2 * sin(x) + sin(x/2)
where x represents a linear increase in temperature (representing increased greenhouse gas-induced warming)
and where {2 * sin(x)} and {sin(x/2)} represent two cycles with different amplitudes (ie influence) and periodicity.
By adding them we see many periods of local extrema, but we also see that each local extrema is larger than the respective (ie min-min or max-max) one that preceded it.
We could also evaluate this fact without even considering the graph. Anyone who has done trig knows that y = sin(x) has an upper bound of 1 and a lower bound of -1. It repeats with a period of 2*pi infinitely. This is a cyclical function. That is how cycles work: They repeat the same graph over and over. The simple transformations I made to the equation means nothing -- I merely increased the bounds by a factor of two for one term and I doubled the period of the other term. Ultimately, this does not change the fact that they stay within the bounds.
So if we look at the overall trend of the line, it is clearly just y = x. It is clearly increasing when you smooth out the inconsequential bumps. Solar variation and La Nina/El Nino are simply bumps. The greenhouse effect, ever increasing by our release of greenhouse gases, is the core of the trend.
Simply, we are warming. By looking at the bumps that constructively point downwards and saying "nuh uh", you are simply failing (perhaps deliberately) to see the full picture.